In Fall 2009, I moved to Boston after three years in DC and transitioned from retail to the business world.
This is a blog on realistic mindfulness, maximizing technology, with some irreverent and perhaps vaguely interesting commentary on the side.
Realistic mindfulness, maximizing technology, and occasionally the Boston Red Sox.
If you celebrate Kwanza, happy Kwanza to you! If you celebrate Channukah, I hope it was wonderful. If you celebrate Festivus, have a happy holiday for the rest of us. But we're three days away, and I just gonna say it: Merry Christmas! One and all!
The merriment of Christmas doesn't come from the holiday itself, but more the experience with family and friends. Whether Jesus was the Son of God or not, I am truly thankful for the fact that his reported existence has led to the bringing together of loved ones.
In fact, nothing quite sums up Christmas for me like the 1992 classic: "The Muppet Christmas Carol". Yes, that's right, the Muppets. Enjoy the video below to see what I mean, and I hope everyone is having a wonderful short week!
As of Monday this week, I vehemently disliked going on my Twitter account. Three days later, I've applied some mindfulness to Twitter, and actually enjoy checking my feed a few times a day.
In the 1990s, a British anthropologist theorized that there is a limit for the number of people with whom we can have meaningful relationships. That limit is 150 people. So why the hell was I following around 300 people on Twitter?
Last month, I wrote "Cutting Through The Noise", reflecting on my February 2010 Media Blackout. My basic conclusion was that I needed to be more mindful about communication and consumption:
"That's what my February Media Blackout revealed to me, that I have just "defaulted" to various ways of consuming without thinking about the why."
This week, I began thinking about my journey on Twitter. I joined right at the crest of its popularity, in May 2009, and was initially gung-ho. I followed anyone I found remotely interesting. Then, in the past ten months, I've definitely become ambivalent to Twitter. I took a complete hiatus for three months, not posting at all from the beginning of my blackout in February to setting up autopost for my blog in May. With a few exceptions, I haven't tweeted much at all aside from this autoposting.
So here we are in December, and I started to thinking about "the why" for Twitter. Why not just delete my Twitter? Why not remove it from my life? I like the connections and communications that Twitter brings. That's why anyone is on it. So why did I start to dislike it?
I disliked it because I was following too many people. The 300 people I was following as of Monday included people/accounts I didn't know or care about, people who's tweets didn't add anything into my life, and people whom I felt obligated to follow. On Tuesday, I took a knife to who I was following. And if I'm not following you anymore, it's okay! I'm still accessible (just @ me).
To do this, I applied a simple question of value: Did seeing this person's tweets in my timeline add any value to my life? It was a hard question to ask sometimes, but if I wanted to honestly and mindfully use Twitter, I needed to ask it. Interestingly, Twitter itself recommends this kind of mindfulness:
"If you follow too many people, there’s no way you can keep up with everyone's updates in your timeline. If you need to communicate with someone but don't need to see their updates everyday, you don't have to follow them. Send them an @reply when you need to; it doesn't require following and your update will appear in the person's replies tab, so they can reply back."
I now follow 77 people, and each adds some sort of value. I'm sure this number will increase, and I'll assess as I go. Regardless, I'd highly recommend this for anyone on the fence about Twitter. How many followers do you have?
I still cannot believe it.
I checked Facebook in bed this morning, because I did not want to get up. (It was seven degrees with wind chill outside. Seemed like a good day to procrastinate moving.) Facebook loaded on my iPhone and I was presented with this wall post from my brother:
Welcome to Red Sox nation Mr. Crawford. Where is your locker you ask? No no, not next to Big Papi or Dustin. Yeah right over there. Right next to Adrian and Youk. Relax, you'll fit right in.
I literally could not process this and thought he was joking. My thought process went something like this "Haha, very funny. I keep up on Red Sox news. There was nothing about this yesterday afternoon. Granted I wasn't online last night. Man, that would be awesome. Maybe someone posted a rumor. I'll have to check Sons of Sam Horn. But really? No. Can't be."
Then I went to a few sports websites. Turns out that this "can't be" was being. Lo and behold, Carl Crawford is about to become a Red Sock. Holy crap.
I was happy about Gonzo, but I am floored by this. Who saw this coming? No one. It was supposed to be between the Angels and Yanks. Wow.
I like this deal, a lot. It locks up a likely superstar, and even though he'll be a bit old in his final two years, I'm sure he will still be productive, especially defensively in the outfield. I hear he's a killer clubhouse presence. I love his speed. I honestly don't care about the money. As long as it doesn't prevent getting us a decent bullpen and doesn't somehow impact ticket prices this year, spend whatever you can. I love that this ownership cares, and they care smart.
I've read a few articles today on the whole trade, but my favorite was from Sports Illustrated, which I've pasted below. Enjoy. I can't wait until April.
Red Sox shock the baseball world by landing Carl Crawford
The Red Sox shocked the baseball world, or at least the portion of it that managed to hold on to their drinks around the lobby bars of the winter meetings hotel here when the news broke in the last hour of Wednesday. Boston somehow turned $142 million into stealth money, agreeing to make Carl Crawford the second-highest paid outfielder in baseball history with hardly a moment of preparation by those outside their own suite. It was a rare "wow" moment in a Twitter-mad world. "[Bleeping] Theo," one GM said of Boston general manager Theo Epstein. "What a brilliant move."
This post is about losing money, buying pointless things and how you can learn from my mistakes. Read on to learn about how penny auctions work, my experience, and how to mindfully use them.
Yes, a new internet twist on an old model has emerged. We now have penny auctions. Things like iPads sell for $0.27 - and this is not a scam. In fact, it's a (sadly) brilliant business model, given our consumer-crazed economy. I'd like to share an experiment I conducted back in August regarding how to use penny auctions to buy "things" on the cheap.
There are multiple sites that do this, but my experience was with Quibids. A warning: Internet penny auctions are addicting and, as you'll read about, I do not recommend using them spontaneously.
The Model
Here's how it works. First, you have to buy bids before bidding (they cost $0.60 ea). Second you go look at their auctions.
Nearly everything on the site starts for a penny. Anyone can bid. Each time someone bids, the price of the item goes up by one cent. The most recent bidder becomes the "Current Winner". And here's the twist: every time a bid is cast, the clock resets to at least ten seconds -- giving dozens of more people the ability to bid. The auction only ends when the timer runs out because no one else bids. When the auction ends, the winner pays the ridiculously low final price of the item plus shipping.
Let's take an actual example: An HP All-in-One Printer recently sold for $14.38. Compuxparts was the winning bidder. You can see in the bidding history on the right of the page that other people were in competition for it, but didn't get it. Compuxparts paid $14.38 and got $260 printer. The other people got nothing.
However, the losing bidders can "Buy it Now", which credits the amount they bid to the retail price of the auction. If you had bid 100 times, I would get to deduct $60 (60 cent bids multiplied by 100 bids) from the price. Better than nothing.
So how does Quibids make money? It's rather ingenious. As a penny auction, that means that 1,438 bids were placed for the item. Each person paid $0.60 to bid. Which meant that Quibids got $862.80 from those bids, plus the $14.38 from the winner. Quibids made a 330% profit off that auction - and they probably didn't pay full price for the printer in the first place!
Let's take a look at my experience ….
Me and Quibids (or How I Spent $82 Unnecessarily)
Again, I admit, it's addicting. It's a very flashy website and in a way, it's like gambling. It's oddly exciting to see your username as "Current Winner". I ended up winning the tiniest trashcan you've ever seen (a seven inch simplehuman trashcan), and losing auctions on a football and a basketball, both of which I bought with the "Buy It Now" feature.
So is it worth it? In a word: no. Not unless you use the mindful way of shopping. If you go to this site right now and decide to participate you're going to end up spending money on and buying things you don't need and probably never would have wanted if you didn't click the link. My mistake was curiosity and spontaneity.
If you're interested in the numbers (rounded for simplicity): I spent $47.00 on bids; $8 on the trashcan I won; $27 on the football and basketball. In other words, I spent $47.00 to get the chance to spent $35 on three items I never would have bought otherwise. Though I do enjoy having a football and basketball around.
Worse, the cost of these three items through Google Shopping would have cost me just under $60, significantly less than the $82 I spent on Quibids. In other words, don't do this spontaneously -- you'll buy things you don't need at a higher price than you would have if you just decided to outright buy them. Of course, I will admit that it was fun to do Quibids, but there are plenty of things that are more fun, which are cheaper or a better use of money.
Given all of this, how can there be a way to use Internet penny auctions like Quibids mindfully?
Mindfulness and Internet Penny Auctions
Again, I am not recommending that you use a site like Quibids spontaneously. The only way I would recommend that anyone use Internet penny auctions would be to make a purchase that you've already decided to make. Here's the strategy:
1) If you have decided that you are going to make a purchase, see if it's on Quibids. You are only going to bid on this item. And before you buy it, really consider if you need it. How is it going to add any value to your life? Are you going to want to get rid of it anytime soon? If you truly are already mindfully buying something, have at it....
2) Check the "Value Price" listed on Quibids -- often it's inflated from the retail price. The iPad linked to at the beginning of this post retails for $499, but its "Value Price" on Quibids is $624. You should probably walk away from this one.)
3) Figure out if you're willing to spend the inflated price if you lose the auction. You have to be okay with spending that much money for the device. If you are okay and consider it a reasonable markup for the chance to get it cheaply, continue. If you're not, walk away! Buy it on Amazon!
4) Know when to fold 'em. Calculate the maximum number of bids you should cast. The formula to do this is: The Price The Item Costs ÷ The Price Per Bid = The Maximum Number of Bids You Should Place. As an example: my basketball's full price was $19. The price per bid is $0.60. 19 ÷ .6 = 31.6. For that auction, I knew that I shouldn't bid more than 31 times.
This is important! After 31 bids, I should throw in the towel and just use the Buy It Now option, no matter what the price is. If I had bid 31 times and the price was $1.50 for the basketball, I should stop. I should wait until the auction ends, and take the discount (of $18.60) and buy it normally. If I kept bidding, I'm actually making that basketball more expensive than it really is -- because I'm spending money bidding, plus the ostensibly "lower" price I'd spend at the end.
5) Pick your time. Once you know the number of bids you can cast, go on Quibids at an optimal time. (I found that around 8AM ET was ideal, as it's somewhat inconvenient for the rest of the world. Most of North and South America are not yet awake, many other people on ET are commuting, it's just after lunch in Europe/Africa, and it's nearing bedtime in Asia/Australia.)
6) Patience is a virtue. When you cast your bids, wait until the timer is all the way to 0:01 before pressing "Bid". You want to remove as many chances as possible that someone else would have bid right after you. In other words, you have wasted a bid if you bid at 0:05 and someone else was waiting to bid at 0:01 anyway. The most successful bidders wait until the last possible second to click "Bid". It's a war of attrition -- but you know your limits.
7) Stay committed. Bid all the way to your maximum -- don't give up. You don't have to bid all at once either. You can use Bid-o-matic to automatically place bids after a certain price threshold is crossed. Watch Quibids items for a few days and see how bidding works. It's not sexy, but you learn a lot by doing research.
8) If you don't win, remember to walk away after you hit your maximum. If you do win, congratulations. And of course, while I like figuring things such as Quibids out, I still think a better gift for your Festivus is Kiva.